Monday, May 27, 2013

The "Red" Alert!

Raju Korti
Having covered Naxals and Naxalism extensively for well over two decades between 1979 and 1999 as a professional journalist has proffered its own advantages. I recall vividly doing a story for The Hindu's Frontline magazine in which I had pointed out how the Marxist-Leninist "ideological" movement -- that originated  from West Bengal's Naxalbari and later flourished on the borders of Maharashtra, Madhya Pradeh, Andhra Pradesh and Orissa -- had degenerated into plain brigandry by mid-80s. With the death of Kondapalli Seetharamiah of the People's War Group, easily their most influential ideologue around the time, the movement had started lapsing into mindless violence in the name of protecting hapless tribals and the poor. Scouring the labyrinthine and unpredictable jungles of the Naxal-infested areas of Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh, I realised that the much vaunted claim of the Maoists to protect the poor, have-not tribals from exploitation by the haves wasn't on a sound footing. The simple reason was if the government succeeded in their proverty alleviation programmes and development came the tribals' way, the Naxals would have no plank and would be rendered redundant. Of course, their case was helped by most governmental schemes for the uplift and development of tribals being brought to a nought by corrupt officials, unscrupulous landlords and overzealous police.
Ironically, the appreciation for the article came from those assigned the task of spreading Maoist influence in urban areas and running its propaganda wing -- Kobad Ghandy and his wife Anuradha Shanbhag Ghandy. I found Kobad and his Sociology professor wife too soft-spoken and well read to be involved in a violent movement. Of course, at the time, I had little inkling that Kobad, who was a Special Correspondent with  The Sunday Observer was the founding member of Committee for the Protection of Democratic Rights. He was also believed to be in touch with global ultra-Left organisations. Taking into consideration his ability to analyse the national and international developments, he was also entrusted with the job of building up the Naxal movement in urban areas. Which is how he was finally arrested from Delhi sometime in 2009.
Tall and decently dressed, the fair and bespectacled Kobad was very articulate. His voice hardly rose beyond a whisper. His wife was, however, more vocal.
Though the violent Naxalite movement began in Maharashtra in Gadchiroli division abutting Andhra Pradesh three decades ago, it had failed to spread to other areas. In Kerala too the Naxalites had failed to make much of an impact. Karnataka, where the movement was relatively strong just a decade ago, had seen a split in the rank and file of Maoists after a section of leaders leaders questioned the very principle of area- wise seizure of power starting from forest areas. Ever since the split, the Maoist party failed to strike roots in the state and Kobad was drafted for bringing about a rapproachment.
Interestingly, the Ghandys never discussed Maoism. Each time we met, the talks would centre around journalism. I would often wonder why Anuradha never came to journalism as she would speak very animatedly about things like news selection, headlines, display, layouts and story-writing. Having seen the way she wrote and her understanding of various issues, I had no doubts she would have made a great journalist. But the slim and good-looking Anuradha would laugh it off whenever I suggested her to take up the profession. "You know Raju, I have this activist's mindset, and with Kobad, I have decided to spend my life for the cause of poor tribals in the jungles of Chandrapur, Bhamragarh, Aalapalli, Gadchiroli," she would announce, an air of vehemence in her voice.
It wasn't long before I discovered that the couple had links with the Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights. A junior colleague brought to my notice that the CPDR and other Naxal front outfit hand-outs were usually delivered by Anuradha. Quizzed, she made absolutely no secret of her and her husband's Maoist affililiations and I found it hard to believe that they were connected with such a violent movement, ideology and justifications kept by the side.
One day both vanished and for a long time there were only speculations about their whereabouts. In any case, both never lived like conventional husband and wife and seemed more like a team dedicated to a cause. Their's was a marriage of ideas. The last I heard about Anuradha was she died of cerebral malaria in the jungles of Dandakaranya in central India sometime in 2002. I felt a twinge of sympathy for her, but she had opted for that life of her own volition.
My brief but meaningful interaction with the Ghandys vindicated the focus of my story that the Naxal movement had shed its original credo and was meandering into a cult of needless bloodshed. At the other end of the spectrum, I had seen the PWG leader Seetharamiah whose charisma and knowledge had the potential to turn a right winger into Leftist in no time.
Naxalism has undergone a paradigm shift in the last 15 years. The movement, one-stitch-social-one-stich blood is now mired in the kind of violence that you cannot distinguish from the one unleashed by the terrorists in the name of religion. Both have cadres committed to destabilization of state without any pretensions to meaningful dialogue across the table. And both, potential threats.
   



  


2 comments:

  1. Hi Raju,

    Can you please provide a link to that frontline article and also if you have any online material from where i can understand the causes, growth, ideologies etc. of maoist movement in india. Please mail me at aksabhishek88@gmail.com

    Thanks,
    Abhishek Saxena

    ReplyDelete
  2. This write up gives one the contours of the things at higher than national levels, the blurring lines of management of entire humanity itself for the dominance by one class, Nation, or ideology (religion?). At this level the recognised ideologues are mere foot soldiers. They can cause a lot of damage to the govt's, and suffering to the humanity which is unfortunate to fall in their area of interest/ influence.
    Societies have to be on the look out and to protect their flock and beat/ destroyed these misguided individuals/organisations.

    ReplyDelete

Toying with emotions through emoticons!

Raju Korti Imagine this: an entire conversation, possibly a friendship, sustained through an endless stream of thumbs-up, heart eyes, laughi...