Raju Korti
Sanjay Dutt recently graced our
screens to lament that he can no longer feel peace in India. Coming from anyone
else, such a statement might provoke a serious debate on civil liberties or
societal harmony. Coming from Dutt, it merely invites a collective, weary sigh.
Here is a man who spent his youth ensuring that peace was the last thing his
own family ever experienced. Now at sixty-seven, after a life defined by
reckless self-indulgence and catastrophic choices, he positions himself as a
gentle soul yearning for a calmer nation. The sheer audacity is almost
impressive.
The anatomy of Dutt’s troubled
life is well documented. He was the classic product of a doting mother who
swept his every misdeed under the rug and a stern father who resorted to harsh
measures to instill discipline. Yet, neither love nor the belt could keep him
on the straight and narrow. When his idea of inner peace in 1993 involved
possessing an assault rifle during one of Mumbai’s darkest hours, one wonders
what definition of the word he uses today. His subsequent time behind bars,
punctuated by an absurdly generous sequence of furloughs and paroles, appears
to have taught him precious little about accountability.
This tendency to rewrite history
and play the innocent victim is an old habit. On March 24, 2013, I wrote in my
blog about the sardonic humour in the groundswell of support Dutt received from
his industry peers. The film fraternity, always acting like an autonomous
authority immune from liabilities, rushed to portray him as an acknowledged
Gandhian after his conviction. High-profile politicians and public figures
lined up to declare his actions were merely the result of child-like innocence,
conveniently ignoring the gravity of illegal weapons charges linked to a tragic
terror event.
In that same blog post, I
recalled how his late father Sunil Dutt once spoke to me in near tears. He
narrated how he had staked his entire goodwill and reputation to rescue his
erratic son from the brink. A senior journalist friend also shared harrowing details
of how the elder Dutt would beat Sanjubaba with a belt in a desperate bid to
reform him, leaving physical marks on his legs. But back then, Dutt was beyond
redemption. It took the shock of the Bombay Blasts case to break his complacent
stupor, yet his supporters continued to insist he was just a harmless,
misguided boy.
Someone who never allowed his parents a moment of serenity and spent decades inviting turmoil cannot credibly lecture a nation on peacefulness. India has offered Sanjay Dutt extraordinary leeway, second chances, and a level of forgiveness that few ordinary citizens would ever enjoy. For him to claim he no longer feels peace here is not just rich, it is utterly tone-deaf. If Sanjubaba truly wants to understand why peace feels so elusive, he might start by looking in the mirror.
