Thursday, October 24, 2013

Manna that happened to music!

Raju Korti
The irony couldn't have come through more resonatingly to someone who swamped the pages of Facebook with an incessant stream of glowing tributes all through the day. While paens were being sung to Hindi cinema's arguably most accomplished classical singer, there were hardly 75 mourners at Manna Dey's funeral in Bengaluru.
Sketch courtesy my DNA colleague Bhagwan Das
Life strung cruelest of ironies for Manna Da all through his almost five-decade career, but the gentleman to a fault that he was, he always remained grounded and had the grace to place even some of his less illustrious contemporaries notches above himself.
Composer Jaidev once said that when Manna sang in a classical strain, no other singer could come anywhere close to him and that probably also meant the almighty Mohammed Rafi who more often than not managed to steal a march over the former many times.
Comparisons are odious, yet they happen -- wittingly or unwittingly. Both Manna and Rafi could match each other note for note and competition always invariably brought the best out of the two legends. It is just that though classically more tuned than Rafi, Manna couldn't make himself as flexible as Rafi did in terms of word throw, mood creation and fitting the protagonist's persona.
Yet clash when they did -- vocally of course -- it would be a veritable feast for the Kansens. Take for instance Meri Surat Teri Aankhen (1963) when Dada Burman got Manna Da to evocate an intense tear-jerker like "Poocho na kaise maine rain bitayee" and summoned Rafi's vocals in "Tere bin soone nain hamaare" on the same blind Ashok Kumar. And when you knew how finicky Dada Burman could be about his choice of singers, all you could do was to bask in those melodies without getting into a harangue on who sang better or which song made a deeper impact. In all fairness to Manna Da, he did edge past Rafi.
The supreme irony here is for all his strong classical repertoire, Manna Da could never create any equations. Mukesh was the considered voice of Chaplinsque tramp Raj Kapoor, Talat Mehmood the voice of Tragedy King Dilip Kumar and with the advent of Baiju Baawra in 1952, Rafi the universal donor. Hemant Kumar filled in the blanks.
If Manna Da managed to get a sneak preview of the RK camp, it was more by default than design. Remember, Raj Kapoor wouldn't settle for anyone else except Mukesh in those days. However, both Talat Mehmood and Mukesh -- given their handsome looks -- were bitten by the acting bug. So when Mukesh agreed to do Mashooqa in 1953, RK seethed for reasons that could be well understood from his point of view. That was when Shankar of Shankar-Jaikishen chipped in and reasoned out with Raj Kapoor that Manna Da could be an ideal foil. To the latter's credit, he grabbed the opportunity with all his vocal versatility and made his presence felt in the RK camp via Aawaara, Chori Chori, Shri 420, Parvarish.
Just as when one would have thought Manna Da had become an integral part of the RK apparatus, came in another irony. Having recorded "Zindagi khaab hai" with Salil Da for the Karlovy Vary winner Jaagte Raho, Manna Da had the mortification of seeing the more vibrant Mukesh version on Raj Kapoor's lips. The RK-Mukesh equation was rewritten.
Paradoxes kept punctuating Manna Da's musical sojourn. Shankar (Jaikishen), who wore a different identity when they performed outside the RK banner, plumped for Rafi's vocals like most other composers of that time. And mind you, between the two, Shankar was more steeped in classical music and logically therefore should have rooted for Manna Da. But then Rafi threw up different vistas for different heroes with a range and versatility that Hindi cinema had hitherto not seen and probably will never see. Asked why he preferred Rafi over Manna Da, this is what Shankar said without mincing words:
"There was no easing out of Manna. It was just that Rafi had greater clarity of expression, better enunciation, better diction. Language was never a bar to Rafi's sense of expression, whereas with Manna there could be at times be problems in this direction. Why, to this day, certain top singers in our midst have this problem with language and diction which affect their clarity of expression. Rafi's soz no singer could match. His voice had aatma", it was "Bhagwan ki den. There will not be another singer like Rafi."
The wheels of irony turned a full circle when Manna Da, in a freewheeling chat heaped praises on the same SJ years later saying they were the only composers who thought his voice was hero material unlike many composers of that time who used him fleetingly on the lead actors and more on comedians and character actors. Although that did rankle him, he never made a public issue out of it and kept acknowledging gracefully that he could never beat Rafi except when they pitched their kites against each other in the skies of Mumbai's suburban Bandra. Ironically, in the recording room Manna Da manfully took on Pt Bhimsen Joshi in Ketki Gulab Juhi champak ban phoole in Basant Bahar and Rafi in Tu hai mera prem devta (Kalpana).
The same SJ who put Rafi on the higher pedestal, could do precious little but to put him and Manna Da on an even keel when they were saddled with a theme as musically encouraging as Basant Bahar. Manna Da's one "Bhay bhanjana vandana sun hamaari" had the potential to confront Rafi's two bhajans "Badi der bhayi kab loge khabar mori Ram" and "Duniya na bhaaye mohe ab to bula le". What's more, he overtook the famed Rafi oeuvre to sing the romantic "Nain mile chain kahaan" for the poker-faced hero Bharat Bhushan.
Never the one to rest on his laurels or blow his trumpet, Manna Da always acknowledged Rafi's superiority. I will quote him verbatim: "He was an academy. A university on his own. He was self-taught and his voice always had that something extra that made even trained classical singers not to take him lightly in the recording room. You never knew when he would steal a march over you."
This lavish praise also was tinged with an irony when you knew that Rafi said he was always overawed at the way Manna Da could raise his vocals to the highest level without compromising on the sanctity of the "sur". Perhaps both understood each other well. Right from the time when as an impressionable youngster raring to go, Manna Da saw with chagrin the song his uncle KC Dey had composed went to Rafi from right under his nose. The same Manna Da who had the humility and candour to accept -- in his own words -- that Rafi did a much better job than what he could have done.
In the quick sands of film industry, where equations are made and destroyed at the altar of commercial and vested interests, Manna Da carried no baggage. And that was his strength. While most people lauded Rafi's 180-degree scale that could take on a comedian or a hero, few realized that Manna Da too did that with similar distinction. Manna Da was, simply put, a class apart. 
A thoroughly simple man at heart, Manna Da let his classically sublime vocals do all the talking, never once getting into the rat race. Not that he did not have his share of refrains, but he held them to himself. Even in death.
The time you feel lonely is the time you need to be by yourself. Manna Da exemplified that irony. That someone who could negotiate the trickiest of classical notes with the kind of practiced ease that he did, it was another of those ironies of his life that he had to sing "Sur na saje kya gaoon main..."

14 comments:

  1. Hi Raju, as always consummate writing, straight from heart! My compliments ! Just a small quibble, there was no need to put Rafi and Manna on a weighing scale all through the article - especially since it is a tribute :-) Manna on his own has enough to talk about for generations, Just my thoughts :-) Just so you know, I am as much a Rafi fan as the next person here. Warmest regards and I look forward to your next blog post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. naresh - every one has a right to his view. a blog is totally private and it is the blog owner's greatness that he allows us to read and comment.

      the least a reader could do is remind the author - something vital he misses in mentioning or actually bungles up with the stat's.

      any way this my view. i am a die hard self declared " rafi bhakth " and as you may be knowing ragju garu too is a great fan of rafi saheb, but never for once felt the comparison a " bojh " on manna da's legendary status or scaled up rafi saheb in any way.

      warm musical regards,

      ramesh narain kurpad

      Delete
    2. Ramesh Sir, I saw the link on Facebook when a common friend tagged me, and thus I reached here.

      Disagreement if not done with some prejudice, is the lifeblood of any discussion, or so I think. I had no intention of sounding critical for the sake of it - that is not in my basic nature. My apologies if I still sounded the same.

      With warmest regards to you as well!

      Naresh

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I knew that was coming Naresh. :) So a clarification is in place. I didn't intend to write this as a tribute. Secondly, I wanted to take a completely different angle. I focused on the ironies of Manna Da's life. It hurts to know that the legend died almost unsung and it was left for just a few sane people like us to realize his true worth. I took the Rafi element just because that was the thrust of my meeting with him. In fact, when I asked him questions, he himself veered the conversation to Rafi. (Raju Bharatan unfortunately and wrongly called it a Rafi fixation). As for Manna's singing prowess, no one needs to be told, but since Rafi, this way or that way, was the main reason for his not being considered as the voice of the lead singer, that weighing scale was unavoidable. Most of the things that Manna Da spoke to me was a politically correct talk that comes out of a gentleman who doesn't want to hurt anyone. My headline is an idea that I always kept entertaining what if Manna Da had to become a full-fledged classical singer. Perhaps, he would have been in the league of all-time greats.
    Yet, I humbly accept your view. Maybe next time when an opportunity comes, I shall write a refreshingly different piece -- the kind you will sure like. Thanks a ton for patronizing my writings. Please feel free t0 even pan me if you think I am not up to the mark.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. raju garu,

      humility par excellence - i doff my hat to you S I R.

      if i was in your place, inwardly i would have thought to myself - yaar mainey kyaa gunaah kiyaa.

      ramesh narain kurpad

      Delete
    2. Raju, point taken. I had no intention of sounding critical, just a minor disagreement on a point - a small indulgence, that I was sure that you will allow the friends :-)

      Maybe the timing was such that I took that as a tribute - glad you clarified that it isn't exactly that. Yesterday I was reading a tribute given by a current day MD, and he fell into the trap of comparing both Rafi and Manna and in the end it hardly sounded complimentary.

      I have highest respect for you and your writing, which is usually based on some first hand information or on your very astute and sharp observations. I am sorry if I sounded overcritical - I tried my best not to :) Sadly this is the hazard of keeping thinking friends like Ramesh sir, and to a lesser extent yours truly.

      As always, with warmest regards !

      Delete
  4. raju garu,

    i am sorry if i have hurt you or naresh in my comments above, but, being a taurean - i felt i must record my feeling even if i am beaten up for it.

    now, coming to your sweet write up on manna da. NONE COULD HAVE WRITTEN BETTER. like tendulkar, only you could better your own record in writing.

    this is the first article i felt, i am a bacchhaa in front of you and that applies to many of your readers.

    knowing the person in the subject is one thing but expressing about him so very eloquently is an art - a few have as i have seen. voh aapmein koot koot kar bhara huaa hai.

    i never wanted this blog to end. as you abruptly closed up, i felt - wish you had written a few more paragraphs.

    i dont have the knowledge that you possess to add or delete what you have so very delicately expressed, but, would like to add a few points which occurred with manna da :-

    1) manna da's nephew has robbed him of all his money surreptitiously by forgery and made him bankrupt for which he had registered a legal suit.

    2) the kolkata courts have done nothing about it so far.

    3) his family approached the CM - mamata and the Police commissioner of kolkata in regard to above. nothing was done.

    4) now yesterday mamata had the gumption to call up and ask the family to bring the body to kolkata - so that the state could give him a grand funeral.

    5) the family did not even bother to respond to the CM.

    6) the people ( manna da's fans and local play back singers ) who were in the city ensured that they came and touched his feet and sought his blessings though he had departed.

    7) we cant hold it against the people of bengaluru for not coming out in large numbers. any way i am not being defensive as even in kolkata the scene may not have been more better in so far as the numbers.

    warm musical regards,

    ramesh narain kurpad

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ramesh Sir, thanks so much for that overwhelmingly emotional comment. I think writing about his family affairs would have been inappropriate at this stage.
    My observation about only a few people turning up for his funeral was a reaction in general. I did not mean to cast any aspersions on Benglureans. You can't blame them at all. When the Bengali and Hindi film industry that he served with so much distinction, gave him a short shrift, what can you expect? Actually, hats off to those from Telugu and Kannada films industry who came to pay him his last respects.
    Shame on the Hindi film industry and their hypocritical counterparts in West Bengal.
    PS: Just re-posting the deleted comment with a correction.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Naresh, absolutely no question about you being critical or overcritical. In fact, it feels better when there is another view coming from other quarters. As you said this is a forum for discussion. To be very honest, on second thoughts I too felt I should have written a complimentary piece instead of the one that I wrote. But most knowledgeable people including you are well informed. So why tell people something they already know?. And secondly, it rankled me that someone as gifted as Manna Dey should suffer simply because life threw so many ironies at him. So I decided to pout my heart out there.
    Naresh you are one of the most well informed, level-headed and cultured friends I have on this forum. And that means I have the highest regards for you. It is my nature to take all those seriously who have something sensible to say.
    And yes, I will prefer criticism than praise any day because the former educates and improves. I will not be offended at all even if you pan me roundly. Keep reading my blogs -- whenever you find them relevant -- and give me your precious feedback.
    Thanks so much and regards.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you Manekbhai. Coming from you that's high praise.

    ReplyDelete

Gandhi experimented with Truth. I experiment with Kitchen!

Raju Korti Necessity, as the wise old proverb goes, is the mother of invention. I have extended this rationale to "...and inventions ha...