Thursday, March 17, 2022

Haunted by Phantom's ghost, hypnotized by Mandrake's magic

Raju Korti
The wise have always characterized old age as a period of second childhood and childish behavior. Fast approaching that age, I am showing symptoms of that relapse. For the past few weeks I have been possessed by the desire of revisiting what I consider as the most absorbing part of my childhood. Much before I entered the threshold of high school, it was about the days when our interests lay as much with reading as playing outdoors. And we were treated to the very best and creative.

As friends we pooled and shared story books and cartoons almost on a daily basis. From the likes of illustrated "Chandoba" to "Kumar" (both Marathi) and "Lotpot" (Hindi) to Shakespeare, Dickens, Bronte and Austen and a host of story-tellers, our interests epicentered on cartoon strips made immortal by two legendary characters that seemed very real despite being larger-than-life.

One was the Phantom -- the Ghost Who Walks and the other; Mandrake the Magician. These two occupied bulk of our mindscape and defined recreation and leisure in their truest sense. Published as Indrajaal Comics, these were beautifully illustrated cartoon books that took less than no time to catapult Phantom and Mandrake as more than superheroes in our juvenile minds. Paying for a regular subscription was economically not viable for most of us. We struck a deal where one of us would buy a copy of the month and share it with others. Those who subscribed and got it delivered at home were a case of neighbour's-envy-owner's-pride. I particularly recall how low I felt while begging a Phantom book from a classmate who would act pricey before giving it to us condescendingly. Occasionally, dad would buy for me and I preserved those more jealously than a woman does her jewellery.

The lasting value with Phantom and Mandrake was phenomenal. Having read the next few months issues, it was an abiding pleasure to revisit the old ones to be read and enjoyed anew. The tall athletic figure of Phantom, his googles, his ring that left his stamp on the villains and above all the mystic and intrigue around his persona was compelling and spell-binding. It was difficult to exorcise the Phantom  ghost so much so that even his wife with hour-glass figure, Diana Palmer appealed to our juvenile senses. In his faithful lackey Gurran, we all saw the Ramukaka of Hindi films.

Close on the heels came Mandrake the Magician and his Mr Rippling Muscles side-kick Lothar. Far removed from the arcane charm of Phantom, Mandrake was a parallel superhero whose entrancing charms not only swept off his rivals, it also charmed us like facts being stranger than the fiction. Mandrake's prowess as magician had an inventory in Lothar and I remember nursing desires to have those muscles of steel.

It wasn't until we had added a couple of more years to our puerile minds that our attention was cornered by the creators of these two imposing characters -- Lee Falk and Sy Barry. In my view both had an enormous competition from William Hanna and Joseph Barbera's Tom and Jerry, George Remi's Tin Tin and Rene Goscinny's Asterisk -- the common chord being all coming from the American stable. Lee Falk was the object of our worship because Phantom and Mandrake were the best gifts at that age. The intense urge to revisit those cartoon books and partake of that preoccupation is a testimony -- if it is needed -- that the magic spell cast by Phantom and Mandrake hasn't depreciated with the passage of decades. Lee Falk lapsed into history in 1999 but his creations come with an ageless appeal.

Falk's own life and works are stuff folklores are made of. You have to hand it to anyone whose imaginary characters could reach an estimated 200 million homes every day. Come to think of it, Falk himself a great artist, drew these characters from the influences at home. To catapult them to such heights needs sheer genius. When Falk began his comic strip and comic book writing and drawing career , his official biography claimed that he was a seasoned world traveler who was well versed with Eastern mystics. When we realized that Falk had simply made it up to seem more like the right kind of person to be writing about globe-trotting heroes like the Phantom and Mandrake, our admiration turned into reverence. His trip to New York city to pitch Mandrake the Magician for publication by the King Features Syndicate was at that time the farthest that he had traveled from home. It amused us no end that to avoid the embarrassment of his bluff being called, Falk traveled the world in the later half of his life.

I am of the firm belief that childhood influences come without an expiry date. Falk had a fascination for stage magicians ever since he was a boy. By his own admission, he sketched the first few Mandrake  comic strips himself. When asked why his mind-son magician looked so much like himself, he is reputed to have said "Well of course, he had to. I was alone in a room with mirror when I drew him."  

Soon we found out that Phantom was inspired by Falk's fascination for myths and legends, such as the ones about El Cid, King Arthur, Nordic and Greek folklore heroes and popular fictional characters like "Tarzan" and "Mowgli" from Rudyard Kipling's "The Jungle Book". There was an Indian element as well as he was also drawn by the Thugs of India, and hence based his first Phantom comic on the "Singh Brotherhood". Falk originally considered the idea of calling his character "The Gray Ghost", but finally preferred "The Phantom". Falk must have been surprised that his comic strips that he thought would last a few weeks at best would eventually have the world in a thrall. He wrote them for more than six decades, until the last days of his life.

When Falk died this month in 1999, I remember we friends had observed a two-minute mourning and had watched a CD of "The Phantom" the movie that starred Billy Zane. With all those memories gushing forth, I am once again overtaken by that urge to lapse into those times again. For someone who always squeezes out time to scour old book shops including the sellers on Mumbai's pavements, I have found that Phantom and Mandrake have vanished from their shelf. Online sellers have limited editions and most of them in English. I was more into Marathi versions.

It would be well worthwhile for the times Group that brought out the Indrajaal Comics to rejuvenate them and bring them back to today's generation sold out on phone games and repetitive cartoon channels. I have little idea of the nitty gritty this would entail but the thought is worth the try. If not today's children, I -- like countless of my ilk -- would grab those legendary cartoon books in our second childhood. 

By the way, Lee Falk would have been 111 in April 2022. Falk is history but Phantom and Mandrake will remain contemporary. Ask Tom & Jerry, Tin Tin and Asterisk. Even they will vouch for them in their immortality.             

Monday, March 7, 2022

Of perpetuating tokenism and International Women's Day

Raju Korti

Let me begin with an honest admission. I have never been good with words. On the path from my heart to my brain to my mouth, phrases have become twisted and hopelessly convoluted. The intent -- what I meant to say -- has rarely quite made it out. Anyway, never as evocatively as I would have wanted it to be. Today, March 8 being universally acknowledged as the International Women's Day, I am essaying another go at finding out just how much of that intent has recuperated since.

Most women known to me, this way or that, will pan me for this but let me assure them it is not about the gender but about tokenism. My skepticism about tokenism is because it doesn't change stereotypes of social systems but works to uphold and perpetuate them. It has perceptibly dulled the revolutionary impulse and reason in most, me not excluded. It struck me as I wished some women first thing this morning on the International Women's Day. It was a regulation mechanism that put itself forth outwitting my rational senses.

The United Nation which swears by Peace, Dignity, Equality and therefore a healthy planet, has listed such days to be observed or celebrated almost 300 days of the year. That's a staggering figure when you realize just how much stranglehold tokenism has on people's lives. Tokenism comes with a very short shelf life, much less, binding force. All the lofty intent is thrown by the wayside immediately after. The International Women's Day is a telling example how women are made to sit on Cloud Nine for one day only to be shown their place for the next 364 days. Exceptions only prove the rule.

In human default settings, women's emancipation and dignity is inexorably linked to the oppressive patriarchal mindset that obtains in most parts of the world but it is also true that we have moved much farther from that psyche. Stories about women breaking glass ceilings and dominating (hitherto) male bastions reflect that but tokenism has clouded them. Is it only about the gender war or gender inequality? It isn't!

Years ago, I had commented -- the effect of idly watching too many soaps -- that behind every successful woman there is another woman who is jealous of her success and wants to overtake her by hook or crook. I stood vindicated because most women who countered me officially were condescending in private. Women are bigger enemies of women than men are. But men bashing -- although at times justified given our social milieu -- has become synonymous with women's freedom. The term has lost any substantive impact and import it otherwise should seek to imply. Tokenism teaches people to be conscious of patriotism on the national independence day and discount it the next day.

The policy and practice of making a perfunctory gesture towards the minority (not as in religion) is a load of bunkum and is just a cushion to prevent criticism and give the appearance that people are being treated fairly. Tokenism is a false diversity that allows its audience to believe that it is diverse when in actuality it is not.

There are three components to preventing tokenism: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Ethnicity, race, gender, socio-economic class, sexual orientation and nationality will cease to exist when it boils down to "Live and Let Live". That will make this world a better place to live. Born a human doesn't make a human. With humans comes humanity but with humans, it is lost too. Tokenism looks good only on greeting cards. 

As long as it doesn't sink in that "Saas bhi kabhi bahu thi", tokenism will continue.

Do and Undo: The high-stakes game of scrapping public projects

Raju Korti In the highly crooked landscape of Indian politics, there appears a pattern preceding most elections: the tendency of opposition ...